Over the past few months we have witnessed an escalating
tendency of the religious right to use the word “pagan” in rhetoric that
attempts to fabricate an insidious creeping re design of American cultural and spiritual
sensibilities.
It has been pointed out that these references do not refer to
us “big P Pagans” but rather to the march towards a post Christian society.
This line of reasoning urges us not to perceive these statements as a direct
confrontation of our collective religious identity. Meanwhile the public is being bombarded with the demonization
of the word Pagan with out any information to dispel these statements.
Our community cannot afford to jeopardize the progress we
have made by choosing to not confront those whose intent is perceived as “not
talking about us”. Such a course
of action will only result in more misplaced distrust and discrimination. This
attempt by the religious right to frame the conversation in a way that
replicates the “satanic panic” of past decades provides a perilous framework
for future discourse.
While I am not arguing that every such utterance deserves
the response of the Pagan community en masse, I do believe that these
statements deserve to be corrected with well reasoned and non confrontational
information about what ‘Pagans” really are. Our statements could read something
like:
Upon reading your
recent statements in (insert Publication) I was alarmed to discover your
reference to “Pagans”. By the context of your statements it is clear that you
are not aware that Pagans, as a religious community, are involved in and highly
active in many local, national, and international interfaith activities with
Christians and other major faiths. Like any other faith community we have an interest
in religious freedom, both yours and ours. There are hundreds of examples of
Pagans leading efforts to address homelessness, hunger, educational access,
disaster relief, environmental degradation and freedom of religion.
It is my sincere hope
that, after some research, you will decide that the use of the term “Pagan” in
a context that defines our religious community in a way that does not reflect
the reality our beliefs and actions will have no place in your future
contributions to public discourse.
Should you desire any
further fact based information about our spiritual community please feel free
to contact me at any time.
To the general public, the intellectual exercise of differentiating
between big P and little p Pagans does not exist. In defense of all we have collectively
accomplished we must respond if we wish to avoid being marginalized by a
reframing of the debate that has the potential to diminish our community’s voice.
In no way am I advocating that our community responds in
outrage, organizing protests, petitions, and mass email and phone call campaigns.
Such actions waste valuable resources, energy and intent that can be put to
much better use in addressing the many issues our community is involved in. What I am strongly suggesting is that
statements that denigrate the word “pagan” be responded to with dignity,
education and the expectation that attacks on our spiritual identity are
inappropriate.
Doing nothing, however, is the worst possible option.
4 comments:
I'm a little concerned about borrowing Peter Jones' big-vs-little P terminology here though--kind of lets them set the terms of the debate. One thing we need to be careful of too is that ANY response from us will be viewed by them as confirmation of what they've already said--"see we've upset the Pagans! They see us as a threat! They're responding! Therefore they are out to get us!" I think it's more useful to direct such efforts at any segments of the general public who might be exposed to such nonsense and are actually willing to be educated (like via the media in FL when you were over there).
That's nothing new. When I was a kid, they used to take up collections in school for the "poor pagan babies." The image they portrayed was that of an ignorant, starving, uncouth Third World denizen who could only be helped but never restored/improved/saved.
That's nothing new. When I was a kid, they used to take up collections in school for the "poor pagan babies." The image they portrayed was that of an ignorant, starving, uncouth Third World denizen who could only be helped but never restored/improved/saved.
I am not in America and haven't seen these references to pagans. Could you link to a few examples?
Post a Comment
Please use your name in posting comments. Postings by "Anonymous" will be deleted.